Permalink  04 January 2005

'Not all Pharaohs unjust tyrants'
  Google It!

by Ashraf Naggui.

According to the Holy Quran, the Pharaohs were not tyrants and their statues are not idols, argues Zahi Hawass, Secretary-General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities.

In an interview with Al-Mosawer weekly Arabic-language magazine, Dr Hawass, the famous Egyptologist, stressed that the Muslims' Holy Book, the Quran, doesn't label all Pharaohs as unjust tyrants.

"The Holy Quran only says negative things about one Pharaoh, namely the Pharaoh at the time of Moses," Hawass added.

The SCA Secretary-General blamed the public culture for such generalisations, stressing that there is not enough historical evidence to guess with any certainty who was Pharaoh at the time of the Exodus. "Still, it is likely that it was Ramses II," he told the weekly magazine.

As for 'Pharaonic magic', Dr Hawass said that stories of Moses and the Exodus in the Quran prove that the Pharaohs knew magic and were masters of that art.

"According to verses in the Quran, Allah invested Moses with the ability to perform magic in order to defy the Pharaoh's magicians," he noted.

In Ancient Egyptian literature, he continued, there is the famous tale 'Khufu (Cheops) and the Magicians' which indicates how the Pharaohs used magic.

The story in brief is that Khufu, the Pharaoh for whom the largest of the three Pyramids at Giza was built, wishing to model his own tomb on that of the secret rooms in the Temple of Thoth, orders his son to bring a magician to him.

After a long journey, his son brings him Djed-djedi who lives at Djed-djed-Sneferu. He is a man of one hundred and ten years; every day he eats five hundred loaves of bread and a whole ox, as well as drinking one hundred jugs of beer.

Djed-djedi also knows how to reattach a severed head. However, the magician explains that he cannot do this with humans. Instead, he works his magic upon a goose and says he also knows the number of secret chambers in Thoth's temple.

Hawass said archaeologists and Egyptologists have determined the identity of the Pharaoh at the time of Moses, who lived in the 19th Dynasty, in the New Kingdom.

The senior SCA official also noted that the word 'Pharaoh' is 'bora'a' in hieroglyphics, meaning 'great house' or 'palace'.

"This word first appeared at the beginning of the New Kingdom, specifically in 1550 BC," he said. "The word wasn't found in the era of Abraham or Joseph, who preceded Moses."

Dr Hawass remarked that the word 'Pharaoh' should not be associated with the word 'tyranny'.

"The Holy Quran says that there was only one Pharaoh, who used the Jews as slaves and then ousted them, while the Torah [Pentateuch] refers to two different Pharaohs, one who tortured the Jews and another who ousted them," he told Al-Mosawer.

The Quran rejects the theory in numerous places. One of the most manifest is in Surat el-Qasas (Chapter of the Stories), where Allah relates the "parts of the story of Moses and Pharaoh."

In verse 17 of Surat el-shuara'a, Pharaoh tries to gain sympathy from Moses by relating the 'favours' he did for him in his childhood.

Another point that refutes the 'two-Pharaoh theory' is the fact that Moses is afraid of returning to Egypt after killing an Egyptian.

The Quran rejects the Biblical account that Moses need not fear to return "for all the men who wanted to kill you are dead."

In verses 14 and 15 of Surat el-Qasas (the 26th Chapter of the Quran), Moses fears the people's retribution for his killing an Egyptian. But Allah reassures him, saying that they will not be able to harm him.

These may seem like academic historical details, but it is in fact very important to determine the identity of the Pharaoh.

The Quranic account affirms that the reign of Pharaoh would have to cover the period before the birth of Moses, the years before he left for Midian, the years he spent in Midian and then the years he stayed in Egypt the second time.

As for the Jews' claims that they built the Giza Pyramids, Dr Hawass denied this, saying the Pyramids were built in the era of the Old Kingdom, 1,400 years before the Jews arrived in Egypt.

"Besides, there is no evidence of any Hebrew words dating from that era," he concluded.

The Egyptian Gazette, Egypt, 4 january 2005.


#81 posted by Mark Morgan on 04 January 2005, 11:22:18 PM  Permalink     comment [] trackback []

Iconography: an ancient Coptic tradition
  Google It!

by Ashraf Naggui.

On Christmas Eve, it is the tradition for Coptic Orthodox Christians to light a candle before icons of the saints, either in church or in a monastery or at home.

A Coptic household is never devoid of an icon. Icons have a prominent place in the life and worship of the all Eastern Orthodox Churches.

The word 'icon' is derived from the Greek eikon or the Coptic word eikonigow both of which are similar in their pronunciation.

Icons are representations or pictures of a martyr or other saintly Christians. They usually depict specific saints, a group of saints, angels or Christ. For the most part strikingly simple, they sometimes portray a specific being, with little or no background.

Despite their simplicity, we also find groupings such as the Virgin Mary and Child, which might have somewhat elaborate backdrops.

Others may depict biblical events or other religious themes, although the latter aren't so prevalent nowadays.

There are no accurate statistics about the number of icons in Egypt, as they are hosted by a large number of churches and monasteries.

The Church of Abu Seifein in Old Cairo alone is home to about 280 icons, while Egypt's oldest extant icon is thought to be seen at Saint Catherine's Monastery in Sinai.

This icon was originally located in Europe, where it survived the 'icon war' that was originally launched nearly 1,300 years ago.

According to Supreme Council for Antiquities (SCA) statistics, there are icons in many churches and monasteries in Cairo, the most famous being the Hanging Church (el-Kenisa el-Mu'allaqa) and the Church of Abu Serga (Saint Sergius), both in Old Cairo, as well as the Church and the Monastery of the Holy Virgin Mary in Zuweila Alley (near Bab Zuweila, Islamic Cairo). The Church of the Holy Virgin Mary contains an icon of the Annunciation dating back to 1335.

Historians say that iconography started very early in the first three centuries of Christianity. Archaeologists agree, believing that icons first began popular among the Christian faithful, both in their homes and in churches, at the end of the third century AD.

By the late fourth or early fifth century AD, their use was widespread. According to the Arab historian el-Makrizi, Pope Cyril I hung icons in all the churches of Alexandria in the year AD 420 and then decreed that they should be hung in the other churches in Egypt.

Dr Isaac Fanous, the most famous Coptic iconographer and chairman of the Icons Institute in el-Abassiya district of Cairo, says that iconographers have to study the Bible, because for every shape there is a background history.

"Besides, every church in the world has its own icons. In Egypt, for example, icons depend on Ancient Egyptian writings, while at Saint Catherine's Monastery they are influenced by Byzantine Christianity," Dr Fanous told Al-Mosawer weekly Arabic-language magazine.

Dr Fanous, 75, has painted the icons for the Church of the Virgin in the Ard el-Golf district of Heliopolis, as well as seven churches in Los Angeles, and others in England and Canada. Dr Gawdet Gabra, peripatetic Professor of Coptic Studies, who lectures at a number of US universities, says there is a lacuna in the history of icons.

"We don't know why none of the icons painted between the eighth and 13th centuries is still in existence," he told Al-Mosawer.

"In Europe, a war on icons erupted in the eighth and ninth centuries, known as the 'icon war', when the Roman Catholic Church, acting upon an edict from the Pope in Rome, destroyed all icons in churches, as they were considered at the time to be pagan symbols," he said.

'There was a movement to eliminate icons from churches on the grounds that they were being worshipped as idols," he added.

However, he said, the war wasn't extended to Saint Catherine's Monastery because it was under the rule of Arabs.

"That is why Sinai is still home to some of the world's oldest icons. There are three Egyptian icons still in existence, dating back to the seventh century: one is a painting of Christ and Abbot Menas now in the Louvre Museum in Paris; another of Bishop Abraham is in Berlin; and the third, that depicts Saint Theodore, is in the Coptic Museum in Old Cairo," he explained.

In fact, major restoration of the icons at the Coptic Museum started in 1989. They are like a living account of Egypt's history, reflecting the different civilisations that have graced the land of Egypt, starting with the Ancient Egyptian civilisation, passing through the Greek, the Roman, the Coptic and lastly the Islamic.

The Coptic Museum lies behind the walls of the famous Roman Fortress of Babylon in the ancient district of Old Cairo (Misr el-Qadima).

The area surrounding the museum abounds in many ancient places of worship that have recently been undergoing large-scale restoration work.

Five years ago, a giant project was launched by the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchy and the SCA, with funds from a US research centre, to count and study more than 2,000 icons in Egypt. A register of these precious religious paintings is gradually being compiled.

The Egyptian Gazette, Egypt, 4 january 2005.


#80 posted by Mark Morgan on 04 January 2005, 11:16:38 PM  Permalink     comment [] trackback []

Mons Claudianus
  Google It!

Current World Archaeology November / December 2004

The latest issue of Current World Archaeology has an article that may be of interest to Egyptophiles.

"Mons Claudianus and Mons Porphyrites: Two quarries in Egypt's eastern Desert supplied much of the best building stone for imperial Rome. With an excursus on what the letters written on potsherds reveal, and on food in the desert."

Excerpt here, Current World Archaeology, Think Publishing, London, UK, Volume 1, No. 8, Issue 8, November / December 2004.

Subscribe to Current World Archaeology Magazine via Amazon.com.


#79 posted by Mark Morgan on 04 January 2005, 2:35:17 PM  Permalink     comment [] trackback []